Transition Points Podcast
A series based on the Developing YOUth! Project's "Transition Points: Snapshots of a STEM Journey."
Episode 4: Positive Peer Culture
Cindy shares participants' descriptions of the program's positive peer culture and supportive environment, and some different experiences with science education after leaving the program.
Research Brief #4
Transcript: Episode 4
Hello and welcome. My name is Cindy and I'm a researcher and project manager at the [Griffin] Museum of Science and Industry. You're listening to an episode of our series, "Transition Points: Snapshots of a STEM Journey." "Transition Points" is a series of podcasts, briefs, and blog posts that we've created in order to share some of the insights from our longitudinal study, The Developing YOUth! Project.
This project follows alumni from our legacy teen program here at the Museum. That teen program was called the Science Minors and Achievers. The project is mixed methods and has a quantitative component which includes our annual surveys as well as a qualitative component. The qualitative methods we used include participant observations from when the teens were still in the program as well as in-depth interviews we've conducted with some participants over the years.
We last interviewed our participants during the summer of 2021. Some of them were finishing up college, some were starting their careers, and some were pursuing graduate school. For a few more details about the project and series overall, take a listen to our introductory episode.
When talking to our participants about what they liked about their time at the Museum, they consistently told us "It's the people." In another episode, we discussed how staff helped to facilitate a supportive space for teens in the program. In this episode, however, we're going to talk about how their peers at the Museum helped to foster a positive and inclusive peer community. We then talk about how some of their experiences with peer groups differed after leaving the program, in college.
At [Griffin] MSI
Most Achievers described the peer culture in the Museum as quite positive, which contributed to the supportive environment. Participants appreciated the diversity they found in the program as well as the commonalities they discovered amongst that diversity.
Achievers often commented that peers in the program were extremely diverse in terms of their gender, racial and ethnic identities, religion, socioeconomic status, family immigration status, school experience (public, private, homeschooled), and the area in which they lived (urban, suburban, rural). While their peer group was very diverse, participants were happy to find within the diversity they could see amongst themselves, they also found a common attitude towards learning and teaching science.
Okay, well yeah, it was just my friend group. I actually went to school, I went to elementary school with a person who was in the off site group and we ended up reconnecting and we still talked to this day and he was never somebody who I would have thought we would have still been friends since we we were we were cool in elementary so we weren't friends we had a completely different friend group. And it was cool reconnecting with him because we actually had a lot in common. [...]
INTERVIEWER: Um, when you say that you wouldn't have thought that you two would have had a lot in common but you ended up having a lot in common... What can you talk a little bit about that like what made you think that you wouldn't have had a lot of common.
Um, our background. He's Asian, I am obviously Black. [laughs]
(INTERVIEWER: The transcriber doesn't know that.)
Yeah. He... I don't know we just we never really talked. We, you talk to everybody in elementary school but you still have your own little click so even though we saw each other around it was never like every day friend conversations is just like a hey in the hallway. so when we saw each other there it was like oh I know you Yeah. and we were cool [indistinct]"
In particular, some participants felt this was the first time they'd been surrounded by peers who shared the same ambitions and attitudes towards science. Youth repeatedly described the culture of the SMA program as accepting and inclusive. Some participants commented that they believed the diversity of the youth in the program helped to create that culture.
A lot of people in the suburbs stay in the suburbs, and a lot of people from the city stay in the city. And so for me, and I mean, of course, this is an overgeneralization. But like for me being able to go into the city and interact with kids from all over the city, from the north side of the south side, to the south suburbs to the north suburbs, you know, I think that really kind of opened my eyes to a world that was greater than the world that I had been raised in.
[...]
By coming together with kids from all different, you know, races and backgrounds and socio economic classes, I think that really kind of helped me understand people's backgrounds and keep more of like an open mind that I wouldn't have gotten in elementary school or high school because everyone in my town was exactly like me or Vic, not exactly, but very similar to me.
[...]
I think the achievers program kind of gave me a better understanding of people and who they are and how to interact with people that aren't me or aren't from the same background as me or the same area as me. So that's definitely something that I've kind of been able to like enjoy you know, as I've grown older is that like not everyone is me so you can't treat everyone the same way that I would like treat myself for like my direct friends.In College
The same youth, however, had different experiences in college outside of the [Griffin] MSI community. Emma identifies as a Black African American woman and majored in Computer Science at a large public university. She joined and was active in multiple student organizations for Black Students in STEM at her college, which she described as mostly helpful earlier in her college years. While Emma did find some supportive peer and mentor networks within these organizations, the classes in her major lacked diversity and were predominantly white.
EMMA: Being like, the only Black woman in my class or sometimes the only Black person, I think that I was kind of expecting that, but I didn't realize how isolated I would feel until like, I was actually in those situations...
Emma's response was to normalize the experience.
I think that... I don't know. I just kind of like, just put my head down and do what I have to do. I try not to think about it too much, because it just didn't go away. Like, it just became the normal for me. Because like in my instance, sometimes I'm the only woman on my entire team, or the only Black person on their entire team and so-or both, usually both. It just became normal for me. And it was familiar, like the feeling of being isolated, or like being alone, that was familiar to me. And so after a while, I just didn't even process it as much as I did in the beginning.
Emma went on to share with us how the isolation she faced affected her academic experience:
In my opinion, I was just a little bit behind so I just had to work a little bit harder than I saw other students working. On top of that, the other kids, they had study groups and things of that sort. And, for me, it was very hard to find people that I connected to who were also in my major. And so, I mainly did all my homework... I pretty-well I never had a study group, to be honest. And the only time I ever worked with another person was in office hours with my professor or the TA's or something like that. So I think that having to navigate that experience by myself, for the most part, [was] really, like challenging and stressful.
At the time of our interview, Emma had recently graduated and was on the job market, looking for a position as a software engineer. She was unenthusiastic about her career prospects, explaining that she was passionate about art, creativity, and community-building, but that she rarely encountered and did not expect to find positions that allowed her to do what she loved within her expertise as a software engineer.
On the other hand, some participants had a much easier time in their engineering programs. They described being able to find and form peer groups that could support them through their rigorous coursework. I talked to Ray, a Jewish man whose family immigrated to the US from South America when he was very young. Ray indicated to me that he passes for a white man and benefits from the privileges that come with it.
I asked him about forming study groups during his time in the school of engineering and he said:
RAY: I learned the value of just on the first day of class being like, Hey, I'm making a group chat. Who wants to join in? Yeah. I can't tell you, how many times this has saved me? You know, because not only do people meet up to study, and do like that, but you know, when you're doing homework, someone's like, hey, then he has who has number seven? And some guys like, I have number seven. Another guy's like, I have number sevens. Like let's compare answers. And then you do that. And then oh, my God, it is so useful to do that. Seniors, my last semester of college, I got a math minor in college and take two after classes. And for some reason, I decided to take elementary number theory, its called elementary number theory, it was number theory? I think I got this the sea by the package Elementary, the name thing was gonna be easy. It was, it was the hardest classes I've taken. Wow. Oh, that was all kind of small. But I just that whole was made a group chat thing. And we would end to do every single homework, we would meet for a couple hours. And like, you could rent these little sort of cubicles, or meeting rooms, a library, we'll meet there. And we will kind of hammer out the homework, which was great, because I would not have to, like pass that class otherwise. [...] Making groups has helped me a lot in college. I couldn't have done it without making these groups.
Like Emma, Ray and Cam were in rigorous Engineering programs at large state universities. Cam's perspective on peer networks within the school of engineering was similar to Ray's. Cam, who identifies as a white man, explained the impossibility of getting through such a rigorous program without a supportive peer group-something Emma explained was exactly her experience.
EMMA: I wouldn't have been able to get through it. Like, if I had no friends, if I was by myself, there's no way. It would be impossible to get through it. Yeah. Like it's like basically, you're working with these people so closely, like and everyone's going to each other with questions like there's just no way you got to do it by yourself.
Many of our participants were in school during the COVID19 Pandemic and the corresponding periods of remote learning. Talking to participants about these experiences presented us with an interesting natural experiment. Participants like Cam experienced the contrast between having a strong peer network within his major during undergrad to having to do much of his Master's in Mechanical Engineering program in isolation. I asked him about this shift.
CAM: Yeah, it's definitely a lot harder. I mean, even like for general stuff, like your homework, like, obviously, like even professors and stuff, encourage working with other people on homework, I guess kind of what our workload is like, but it's just the thing with like, COVID is, since all of our classes were in person in the new program, I didn't know anyone because only people the only person I knew was my roommate. So like we stuck together, but I didn't know anyone else. So like it was just me and him. Working on this stuff together, it's definitely a lot harder because like an undergrad, we'd have like a whole group of people like five or six my friends. And we would always like go to the computer labs, and engineering buildings and work on stuff together with each other great questions and stuff like that is way different now. Definitely worse.
Implications
Participants in the Science Minors and Achievers program valued the diversity they found at the Museum. However, for many that diversity was absent in the colleges they attended. Instead of finding a home with their peers, they felt alone. Some changed schools, some changed majors, and some stuck with it but graduated with less optimism and enthusiasm for STEM and their future as a whole.
Positive youth development (PYD) programs rightfully focus on the positive aspects of what youth bring to an experience and what they can achieve. However, more work may need to be done to prepare them for situations without the kind of scaffolded support Positive youth Development programs, like the Science Minors and Achievers program, offer. Certainly, more research needs to be done about the transition from high school to college for these young adults.
Conclusion
While in this episode we compared how Achievers felt about their peers within [Griffin] MSI and then some of their experiences with peer groups in college, in another episode, we go into how Achievers felt staff in the program helped to provide a supportive community. We also get into how this type of support may have been lacking for some participants in college.
In our episode on belonging, we discuss more broadly, a sense of belonging to communities inside and outside of the Museum. In that episode we dig deeper into how feeling a sense of belonging to communities, or rather, feeling the absence of this, affected some of our Black Women-identifying participants in particular. We focused on these participants because of the stark contrast between their experiences in college, and the experiences our participants described while in the Science Minors and Achievers program.
Our episode on Skill Building for Success focuses more on how other features of the program helped participants to build skills that set them apart from their peers in college or in their careers. In our episode on Meaningful Opportunities, we'll talk a little bit more about how our participants felt they were able to use science education to impact their communities.
Acknowledgements
Transition Points: Snapshots of a STEM Journey is based on findings from The Developing YOUth! Project, a longitudinal, mixed-methods, and quasi-experimental study from the Griffin Museum of Science and Industry. The project started in 2016 and is currently supported by the Elizabeth Morse Genius Charitable Trust. Previously, it has been supported by the National Science Foundation. Special thanks to Dr. Aaron Price, the original principal investigator; Dr. Faith Kares and Dr. Ali Mroczkowski for their previous work on this project; and Dr. Cindy La Nguyen, the creator of this series. All participant information, such as names and occupations, have been modified or altered in order to maintain confidentiality.